ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Feasibility of the soft attention-based models for automatic segmentation of OCT kidney images.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney Segmentation of Histopathological Images with Edge-Aware U-Net to Support Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced kidney mass segmentation using VHUCS-Net with protuberance detection network.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Autonomous Surgical Guidance Using 3-Dimensional Images From Forward-Viewing Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- PyGlaucoMetrics: A Stacked Weight-Based Machine Learning Approach for Glaucoma Detection Using Visual Field Data.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Automatic and real-time tissue sensing for autonomous intestinal anastomosis using hybrid MLP-DC-CNN classifier-based optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Large Area Kidney Imaging for Pre-transplant Evaluation using Real-Time Robotic Optical Coherence Tomography.Research square · 2023Article
- Deep ensemble learning for automated non-advanced AMD classification using optimized retinal layer segmentation and SD-OCT scans.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility of the soft attention-based models for automatic segmentation of OCT kidney images.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinically, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been utilized to obtain the images of the kidney's proximal convoluted tubules (PCTs), which can be used to quantify the morphometric parameters such as tubular density and diameter. Such parameters are useful for evaluating the status of the donor kidney for transplant. Quantifying PCTs from OCT images by human readers is a time-consuming and tedious process. Despite the fact that conventional deep learning models such as conventional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved great success in the automatic segmentation of kidney OCT images, gaps remain regarding the segmentation accuracy and reliability. Attention-based deep learning model has benefits over regular CNNs as it is intended to focus on the relevant part of the image and extract features for those regions. This paper aims at developing an Attention-based UNET model for automatic image analysis, pattern recognition, and segmentation of kidney OCT images. We evaluated five methods including the Residual-Attention-UNET, Attention-UNET, standard UNET, Residual UNET, and fully convolutional neural network using 14403 OCT images from 169 transplant kidneys for training and testing. Our results show that Residual-Attention-UNET outperformed the other four methods in segmentation by showing the highest values of all the six metrics including dice score (0.81 ± 0.01), intersection over union (IOU, 0.83 ± 0.02), specificity (0.84 ± 0.02), recall (0.82 ± 0.03), precision (0.81 ± 0.01), and accuracy (0.98 ± 0.08). Our results also show that the performance of the Residual-Attention-UNET is equivalent to the human manual segmentation (dice score = 0.84 ± 0.05). Residual-Attention-UNET and Attention-UNET also demonstrated good performance when trained on a small dataset (3456 images) whereas the performance of the other three methods dropped dramatically. In conclusion, our results suggested that the soft Attention-based models and specifically Residual-Attention-UNET are powerful and reliable methods for tubule lumen identification and segmentation and can help clinical evaluation of transplant kidney viability as fast and accurate as possible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.