Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774323›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Feasibility of the soft attention-based models for automatic segmentation of OCT kidney images.

Mousa Moradi, Xian Du, Tianxiao Huan, Yu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mousa MoradiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-9523
Xian DuInstitute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-2840
Tianxiao HuanDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Yu ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical Science and Translational SupplementUL1TR001453 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2015 to 2024
$39.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been utilized to obtain the images of the kidney's proximal convoluted tubules (PCTs), which can be used to quantify the morphometric parameters such as tubular density and diameter. Such parameters are useful for evaluating the status of the donor kidney for transplant. Quantifying PCTs from OCT images by human readers is a time-consuming and tedious process. Despite the fact that conventional deep learning models such as conventional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved great success in the automatic segmentation of kidney OCT images, gaps remain regarding the segmentation accuracy and reliability. Attention-based deep learning model has benefits over regular CNNs as it is intended to focus on the relevant part of the image and extract features for those regions. This paper aims at developing an Attention-based UNET model for automatic image analysis, pattern recognition, and segmentation of kidney OCT images. We evaluated five methods including the Residual-Attention-UNET, Attention-UNET, standard UNET, Residual UNET, and fully convolutional neural network using 14403 OCT images from 169 transplant kidneys for training and testing. Our results show that Residual-Attention-UNET outperformed the other four methods in segmentation by showing the highest values of all the six metrics including dice score (0.81 ± 0.01), intersection over union (IOU, 0.83 ± 0.02), specificity (0.84 ± 0.02), recall (0.82 ± 0.03), precision (0.81 ± 0.01), and accuracy (0.98 ± 0.08). Our results also show that the performance of the Residual-Attention-UNET is equivalent to the human manual segmentation (dice score = 0.84 ± 0.05). Residual-Attention-UNET and Attention-UNET also demonstrated good performance when trained on a small dataset (3456 images) whereas the performance of the other three methods dropped dramatically. In conclusion, our results suggested that the soft Attention-based models and specifically Residual-Attention-UNET are powerful and reliable methods for tubule lumen identification and segmentation and can help clinical evaluation of transplant kidney viability as fast and accurate as possible.

Identifiers

PMID35774323
PMCPMC9203082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.