ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Micron-scale hysteresis measurement using dynamic optical coherence elastography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Clarifying the landscape of mechanical sensors from stress to strain.Nature sensors · 2026Article
- Processing pipeline for large optical coherence elastography datasets with quasi-static air-jet excitation: application to human brain tumor tissue.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Engineering Bonding Types and Macromeric Cross-Linkers in the Network To Modulate the Structures and Properties of Polydextran/Chitosan Hybrid Hydrogels.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Air-pulse optical coherence elastography: how excitation angle affects mechanical wave propagation.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Corneal Surface Wave Propagation Associated with Intraocular Pressures: OCT Elastography Assessment in a Simplified Eye Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a novel optical coherence elastography (OCE) method to characterize mechanical hysteresis of soft tissues based on transient (milliseconds), low-pressure (<20 Pa) non-contact microliter air-pulse stimulation and micrometer-scale sample displacements. The energy dissipation rate (sample hysteresis) was quantified for soft-tissue phantoms (0.8% to 2.0% agar) and beef shank samples under different loading forces and displacement amplitudes. Sample hysteresis was defined as the loss ratio (hysteresis loop area divided by the total loading energy). The loss ratio was primarily driven by the sample unloading response which decreased as loading energy increased. Samples were distinguishable based on their loss ratio responses as a function loading energy or displacement amplitude. Finite element analysis and mechanical testing methods were used to validate these observations. We further performed the OCE measurements on a beef shank tissue sample to distinguish the muscle and connective tissue components based on the displacement and hysteresis features. This novel, noninvasive OCE approach has the potential to differentiate soft tissues by quantifying their viscoelasticity using micron-scale transient tissue displacement dynamics. Focal tissue hysteresis measurements could provide additional clinically useful metrics for guiding disease diagnosis and tissue treatment responses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.