ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Compression optical coherence elastography versus strain ultrasound elastography for breast cancer detection and differentiation: pilot study.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of breast-mimicking phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- A Low-Cost Optomechatronic Diffuse Optical Mammography System for 3D Image Reconstruction: Proof of Concept.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: a multicenter, prospective study.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- A novel stress sensor enables accurate estimation of micro-scale tissue mechanics in quantitative micro-elastography.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Article
- Viscoelasticity quantification of cancerous tongue using intraoral optical coherence elastography: a preliminary study.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- In-vivo characterization of scleral rigidity in myopic eyes using fundus-pulsation optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Analysis of friction in quantitative micro-elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Real-Time Nondestructive Viscosity Measurement of Soft Tissue Based on Viscoelastic Response Optical Coherence Elastography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Towards targeted colorectal cancer biopsy based on tissue morphology assessment by compression optical coherence elastography.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this study are (i) to compare ultrasound strain elastography (US-SE) and compression optical coherence elastography (C-OCE) in characterization of elastically linear phantoms, (ii) to evaluate factors that can cause discrepancy between the results of the two elastographic techniques in application to real tissues, and (iii) to compare the results of US-SE and C-OCE in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. On 22 patients, we first used standard US-SE for
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.