Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774300›Full record

SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Wenxian Wang, Feibing Long, Xinshun Wu, Shanhuan Li, Ji Lin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06812338 (Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06812338 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsNon-specific Low Back Pain, Lumbar TractionArmsmechanical traction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenxian WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102 Hainan, China.
Feibing LongDepartment of Surgery, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, 570100 Hainan, China.
Xinshun WuDepartment of Surgery, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, 570100 Hainan, China.
Shanhuan LiDepartment of Surgery, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, 570100 Hainan, China.
Ji LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Wenchang City People's Hospital, Wenchang, 571300 Hainan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-3647
Hainan Medical College Hospital · CNHainan Medical University · CNWenzhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study is aimed at exploring the clinical effect of mechanical traction on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: Related literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. Inclusion of literature topic was comparison of mechanical traction and conventional physical therapy for lumbar disc herniation. Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCT studies. The Chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test, and a random effect model was used with heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. If there was no heterogeneity, the fixed effect model was used, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias. Results: Visual analog scale (VAS) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group (MD = -1.39 (95% CI (-1.81, -0.98)), Conclusion: Mechanical traction can effectively relieve lumbar and leg pain and improve ODI in patients with lumbar disc herniation but has no significant effect on spinal motion. The therapeutic effect of mechanical traction was significantly better than that of conventional physical therapy. Lumbar traction can be used in conjunction with other traditional physical therapy.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementHumansLumbar VertebraePhysical Therapy ModalitiesTractionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35774300
PMCPMC9239808
OpenAlexW4283257393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.