Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774108›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2022

Refining a DEI Assessment Tool for Use in Optimizing Professional STEM Societies for Gender Equity.

Gretalyn M Leibnitz, Jan W Peters, Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo, Heather Metcalf, Andrea Lucy Putwen, Donald L Gillian-Daniel, Ershela L Sims, Verónica A Segarra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gretalyn M LeibnitzAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Jan W PetersKatalytik, Christchurch, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Campbell-MontalvoAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Heather MetcalfAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Andrea Lucy PutwenAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Donald L Gillian-DanielAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Ershela L SimsAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.
Verónica A SegarraAmplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historic science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplinary cultures were founded in a system that was predominately male, white, heterosexual, and able-bodied (i.e., "majority"). Some societal norms have changed, and so has demand for inclusive STEM engagement. However, legacy mental models, or deeply held beliefs and assumptions, linger and are embedded in the STEM system and disciplinary cultures. STEM reform is needed to maximize talent and create inclusive professions, but cannot be achieved without recognizing and addressing norms and practices that disproportionately serve majority vs. minoritized groups. As leading voices in disciplinary work and application, disciplinary and professional societies (Societies) are instrumental in shaping and sustaining STEM norms. We, leaders of the Amplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+) project, recognize the need to provide Society diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) change leaders with tools necessary to foster systemic change. In this Perspectives article, we present the Equity Environmental Scanning Tool (EEST) as an aid to help Society DEI change leaders elucidate legacy mental models, discern areas of strength, identify foci for advancement, and benchmark organizational change efforts. We share our rationale and work done to identify, and, ultimately, adapt a Society DEI self-assessment tool from the United Kingdom. We share background information on the UK tool, content and structural changes made to create the EEST, and an overview of the resulting EEST. Ultimately, we seek to increase awareness of a Society-specific DEI self-assessment tool designed to help Society DEI change leaders advance inclusive reform.

Indexed as

and inclusion (DEI) toolassessmentdiversityequityEquity Environmental Scanning Tool (EEST)professional societies and associationsprofessional society self-assessment toolscience technology engineering mathematics (STEM)survey design

Identifiers

PMID35774108
PMCPMC9237367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.