Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774038›Full record

ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2022

Breaking Bad News During COVID-19 Time in Surgical, Emergency and Medical Specialties - What More we Need to Develop?

Hasan Khalaf, Basim Almothafar, Noor Alhalabi

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hasan KhalafGeneral and Vascular Surgery, Whipps Cross Teaching Hospital, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
Basim AlmothafarDepartment of Surgery, Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
Noor AlhalabiQueens Hospital in London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breaking bad news is one of the complex communication skills essential to the practice of every clinician. It involves not only the mere provision of information, but also how to deal with the emotions of the patients and the response of their relatives. Therefore, certain protocols are employed for this process, including "BREAKS", "SPIKES", and "ABCDE" protocols. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic mandated the use of strict infection control measures including social distancing, requiring the utilization of telecommunication technologies for breaking bad news. Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the use on non-physical methods in breaking bad news by physicians and to evaluate the need for more development and training. Methods: Cross-sectional survey conducted in Kufa Medical College Al-Najaf during April - June 2021, and included 60 physicians of various specialties working in that hospital. Results: Majority of participants 88.3% reported breaking bad news regularly. Less than half of participants 46.7% received training on breaking bad news, and only 13.3% received training on non-physical breaking bad news. More than half of participants mentioned that showing empathy is the area that needs improvement the most. Conclusion: High proportion of physicians lacks the necessary skills to break bad news, especially using non-physical ways during the pandemic. Well-structured programs are needed for the training of healthcare providers on breaking bad news, with certain adaptations for traditional protocols to be appropriate for telephone or video conferencing.

Indexed as

COVID-19MedicineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsTruth Disclosurebreaking bad newscommunicationCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID35774038
PMCPMC9233462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.