ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022
Deep learning on reflectance confocal microscopy improves Raman spectral diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin Cancer Image Classification Using Artificial Intelligence Strategies: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Review
- From Vibrations to Visions: Raman Spectroscopy's Impact on Skin Cancer Diagnostics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Practices, Potential, and Perspectives for Detecting Predisease Using Raman Spectroscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceRaman spectroscopy (RS) provides an automated approach for assisting Mohs micrographic surgery for skin cancer diagnosis; however, the specificity of RS is limited by the high spectral similarity between tumors and normal tissues structures. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) provides morphological and cytological details by which many features of epidermis and hair follicles can be readily identified. Combining RS with deep-learning-aided RCM has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of RS in an automated fashion, without requiring additional input from the clinician.
aimThe aim of this study is to improve the specificity of RS for detecting basal cell carcinoma (BCC) using an artificial neural network trained on RCM images to identify false positive normal skin structures (hair follicles and epidermis). APPROACH: Our approach was to build a two-step classification model. In the first step, a Raman biophysical model that was used in prior work classified BCC tumors from normal tissue structures with high sensitivity. In the second step, 191 RCM images were collected from the same site as the Raman data and served as inputs for two ResNet50 networks. The networks selected the hair structure and epidermis images, respectively, within all images corresponding to the positive predictions of the Raman biophysical model with high specificity. The specificity of the BCC biophysical model was improved by moving the Raman spectra corresponding to these selected images from false positive to true negative.
resultsDeep-learning trained on RCM images removed 52% of false positive predictions from the Raman biophysical model result while maintaining a sensitivity of 100%. The specificity was improved from 84.2% using Raman spectra alone to 92.4% by integrating Raman spectra with RCM images.
conclusionsCombining RS with deep-learning-aided RCM imaging is a promising tool for guiding tumor resection surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.