Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35773738›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2022

Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.

Francesca Collins, Kelly Gilmore, Kelsey A Petrie, Lyndsey S Benson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca CollinsUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, 1959 NE Pacific Street Seattle, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Kelly GilmoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Kelsey A PetrieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. petrik@uw.edu.
Lyndsey S BensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Society of Family Planning SFPRF10-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method.

methodsThis was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal.

resultsExpert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD.

conclusionsIUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal.

Indexed as

IUD self-removal guide

Identifiers

PMID35773738
PMCPMC9247965
OpenAlexW4283754807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.