Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35773730›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2022

Does one size fit all? A qualitative study about the need for individualized information transfer for orthognathic patients.

Isabelle Graf, Anna Enders, Ute Karbach, Tatjana Mihailovic, Teresa Kruse, Melanie Pollklas, Karolin Höfer, Joachim Zöller, Bert Braumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isabelle GrafDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany. isabelle.graf@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9598-8861
Anna EndersDepartment for Research and Quality Management, Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), Cologne, Germany.
Ute KarbachInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculties of Medicine and Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tatjana MihailovicDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Teresa KruseDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Melanie PollklasClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Karolin HöferDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Joachim ZöllerDepartment of Dental Surgery and Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bert BraumannDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFor any orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, it is crucial that patients are provided with enough and proper information in order to make evidence-based decisions- not only prior to treatment start, but also throughout the course of therapy. Thus, the objectives of this qualitative study were to identify information needs of patients undergoing combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Additionally, professionals' perspectives were evaluated.

methodsA qualitative research approach was chosen in order to determine crucial aspects of information needs before and throughout treatment. With respect to a purposive sampling strategy and thematic saturation, we conducted ten semi-structured interviews with patients who had finished their orthodontic-orthognathic surgery treatments (five women, five men; being 21 to 34 years old). The indications for the combination treatment were severe skeletal Class IIs to Class IIIs with various vertical and transverse discrepancies. In addition, a multidisciplinary focus-group with six professionals from the maxillofacial surgery and orthodontic department (three women, three men; being 30 to 38 years old) helped to reflect about the experts' point of views. After transcription, data was categorized and analyzed by Mayring's content analysis.

resultsWe identified three key themes. During this analysis, we focused on theme (1) 'information transfer' with its corresponding categories 'information needs' - depending on different treatment stages -, 'source of information' and 'doctor-patient-communication'. The affected patients ranked individualized patient information and empathetic doctor-patient-communication high. This was mostly in line with the professionals' point of view. Verbal communication was seen as being the best way to communicate throughout treatment. The role of the internet as a source of information was seen diversely.

conclusionThis qualitative study highlights the need for individualized patient information and reveals both met and unmet information needs by patients. Although evidence-based written information is highly necessary for orthognathic patients and their families alike, it cannot replace an empathetic way of direct verbal doctor-patient-communication. It seems crucial to give specific individualized information at different treatment stages, starting at a thoroughly interdisciplinary screening at the very beginning.

Indexed as

Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchYoung AdultInformation needsOrthodonticsOrthognathic surgeryQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35773730
PMCPMC9245358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.