Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35773354›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2022

Influence of oral processing behaviour and bolus properties of brown rice and chickpeas on in vitro starch digestion and postprandial glycaemic response.

Yao Chen, Markus Stieger, Edoardo Capuano, Ciarán G Forde, Sandra van der Haar, Meeke Ummels, Heleen van den Bosch, Rene de Wijk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04648397 (The Effect of Chewing Duration on Blood Glucose Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04648397 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Chewing Duration on Blood Glucose Levels

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen University and ResearchRan2020 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsGlucose, High Blood, Glucose, Low BloodArmsLow glycaemic load, high fibrous product, High glycaemic load, low fibrous product
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yao ChenFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. chenyaocathy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-3340
Markus StiegerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Sensory Science and Eating Behaviour, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Edoardo CapuanoFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ciarán G FordeDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Sensory Science and Eating Behaviour, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sandra van der HaarFood & Biobased Research, Fresh Food Chains, Food, Health & Consumer Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Meeke UmmelsFood & Biobased Research, Fresh Food Chains, Food, Health & Consumer Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Heleen van den BoschFood & Biobased Research, Fresh Food Chains, Food, Health & Consumer Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Rene de WijkFood & Biobased Research, Fresh Food Chains, Food, Health & Consumer Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (NL) KB-37-001-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOral processing behaviour may contribute to individual differences in glycaemic response to foods, especially in plant tissue where chewing behaviour can modulate release of starch from the cellular matrix. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of chewing time of two starch based foods (brown rice and chickpeas) on bolus properties, in vitro starch digestion and postprandial glycaemic excursion in healthy subjects.

methodsIn a cross-over trial participants (n = 26) consumed two carbohydrates-identical test meals (brown rice: 233 g; chickpeas: 323 g) with either long (brown rice: 41 s/bite; chickpeas: 37 s/bite) or short (brown rice: 23 s/bite; chickpeas: 20 s/bite) chewing time in duplicate while glycaemic responses were monitored using a continuous glucose monitoring device. Expectorated boli were collected, then bolus properties (number, mean area, saliva amylase activity) and in vitro starch digestion were determined.

resultsLonger chewing resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) more and smaller bolus particles, higher bolus saliva uptake and higher in vitro degree of intestinal starch hydrolysis (DH_S

conclusionDifferences in the innate structure of starch based foods (brown rice compared to chickpeas) have a larger effect on postprandial glucose response than differences in mastication behaviour although oral processing behaviour showed consistent effects on bolus properties and in vitro starch digestion. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04648397 (First posted: December 1, 2020).

Indexed as

CicerOryzaAmylasesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCross-Over StudiesDigestionHumansMealsStarchAmylasesBlood GlucoseStarchBrown riceChewing timeChickpeasIn vitro starch digestionPostprandial glycaemic response

Identifiers

PMID35773354
PMCPMC9596526
OpenAlexW4283730000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.