ArticleScientific reports2022
Retinal ganglion cell analysis in patients with sellar and suprasellar tumors with sagittal bending of the optic nerve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of para-chiasmal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Recovery in pupillometric non-visual functions following chiasmal decompression in pituitary adenoma.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of visual function, retinal ganglion cells, and nerve fiber layer in patients with adult craniopharyngioma.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Fundus Blood Flow in Patients with Sellar Lesions with Optic Nerve Bending and Chiasmal Compression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Eye Selection Criteria's Influence in the Value of Pituitary Macroadenoma Management Biomarkers: Preliminary Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term retinal microvascular alterations after endoscopic endonasal surgery in patients with sellar region tumors.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated clinical features of sellar and suprasellar tumors with optic nerve bending. Twenty-five patients (13 men/12 women; age, 59.0 ± 12.9 years) with optic nerve bending in one eye who underwent tumor resection for sellar and suprasellar tumors were included. The other eye, without optic nerve bending, was the control. The pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and ganglion cell layer (GCL) + inner plexiform layer (IPL) thickness were studied retrospectively using optical coherence tomography. Preoperative BCVA in the eye with optic nerve bending was significantly poor and improved significantly after tumor resection. Eyes with optic nerve bending had significantly less GCL + IPL thickness on the temporal side than eyes without optic nerve bending. Preoperative GCL + IPL thickness of the entire macula was reduced in eyes with optic nerve bending and poor postoperative BCVA compared to those with good postoperative BCVA. There was no significant difference in GCL + IPL thickness of eyes with optic nerve bending before and after tumor resection. Optic nerve bending caused by sellar and suprasellar tumors resulted in visual impairment and decreased retinal ganglion cells. Eyes with optic nerve bending and severely reduced GCL + IPL thickness may have less BCVA improvement after tumor resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.