Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35773272›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

Different bimodal neuromodulation settings reduce tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized trial.

Brendan Conlon, Caroline Hamilton, Emma Meade, Sook Ling Leong, Ciara O Connor, Berthold Langguth, Sven Vanneste, Deborah A Hall, Stephen Hughes, Hubert H Lim

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03530306 (Treatment Evaluation of Neuromodulation for Tinnitus - Stage A2), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03530306 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment Evaluation of Neuromodulation for Tinnitus - Stage A2 (TENT-A2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuromod Devices Ltd.Ran2018 to 2019Enrolled191ConditionsTinnitusArmsPS1-PS4, PS6-PS10, PS7-PS4, PS9-PS6
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Tinnitus: A Dimensionally Segregated, yet Perceptually Integrated Heterogeneous Disorder.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Trial
  5. Focal tDCS of auditory cortex in chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled mechanistic trial.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Auditory Network Discoherence in Chronic Tinnitus.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Inhibition of Cortical Evoked Responses to Sound Pulses by Preceding Silent Gaps.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Current State of Tinnitus Diagnosis and Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Expert Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Brendan ConlonNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Caroline HamiltonNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Emma MeadeNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Sook Ling LeongNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Ciara O ConnorNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Sven VannesteTrinity Institute for Neuroscience and Global Brain Health Institute, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.
Deborah A HallNational Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Stephen HughesNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland.
Hubert H LimNeuromod Devices Limited, Dublin, D08 R2YP, Ireland. hubert.lim@neuromoddevices.com.
Neuromod (Ireland) · IEHeriot-Watt University Malaysia · MYThe University of Texas at Dallas · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 10% of the population suffers from tinnitus, which is a phantom auditory condition that is coded within the brain. A new neuromodulation approach to treat tinnitus has emerged that combines sound with electrical stimulation of somatosensory pathways, supported by multiple animal studies demonstrating that bimodal stimulation can elicit extensive neural plasticity within the auditory brain. More recently, in a large-scale clinical trial, bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation drove significant reductions in tinnitus symptom severity during the first 6 weeks of treatment, followed by diminishing improvements during the second 6 weeks of treatment. The primary objective of the large-scale randomized and double-blinded study presented in this paper was to determine if background wideband noise as used in the previous clinical trial was necessary for bimodal treatment efficacy. An additional objective was to determine if adjusting the parameter settings after 6 weeks of treatment could overcome treatment habituation effects observed in the previous study. The primary endpoint at 6-weeks involved within-arm and between-arm comparisons for two treatment arms with different bimodal neuromodulation settings based on two widely used and validated outcome instruments, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Functional Index. Both treatment arms exhibited a statistically significant reduction in tinnitus symptoms during the first 6-weeks, which was further reduced significantly during the second 6-weeks by changing the parameter settings (Cohen's d effect size for full treatment period per arm and outcome measure ranged from - 0.7 to - 1.4). There were no significant differences between arms, in which tongue stimulation combined with only pure tones and without background wideband noise was sufficient to reduce tinnitus symptoms. These therapeutic effects were sustained up to 12 months after the treatment ended. The study included two additional exploratory arms, including one arm that presented only sound stimuli during the first 6 weeks of treatment and bimodal stimulation in the second 6 weeks of treatment. This arm revealed the criticality of combining tongue stimulation with sound for treatment efficacy. Overall, there were no treatment-related serious adverse events and a high compliance rate (83.8%) with 70.3% of participants indicating benefit. The discovery that adjusting stimulation parameters overcomes previously observed treatment habituation can be used to drive greater therapeutic effects and opens up new opportunities for optimizing stimuli and enhancing clinical outcomes for tinnitus patients with bimodal neuromodulation.

Indexed as

TinnitusAcoustic StimulationAnimalsDouble-Blind MethodHumansNeuronal PlasticityNoiseTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35773272
PMCPMC9246951
OpenAlexW4283736413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.