Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772973›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2022

Preoperative Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Increases the Risk of a Dural Tear During Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.

Akash Shakya, Ayush Sharma, Vijay Singh, Amisha Rathore, Vinayak Garje, Venkatramana Wadgave, Ghanshyam Kakadiya, Nandan Marathe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akash ShakyaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Dr BAM Hospital, Mumbai, India akashshakya.gmc@gmail.com.
Ayush SharmaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Dr BAM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vijay SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Dr BAM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Amisha RathoreESIC and PGIMSR, Mumbai, India.
Vinayak GarjeESIC and PGIMSR, Mumbai, India.
Venkatramana WadgaveDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Dr BAM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Ghanshyam KakadiyaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nandan MaratheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INCollege of Medicine & JNM Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESI) are known to be a risk factor for intraoperative dural tears in traditional spine surgery. However, whether the same holds true after minimally invasive surgery is debatable. The authors decided to investigate the incidence of complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy after a preoperative LESI.

methodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on patients ages 21 to 65 years who underwent minimally invasive lumbar discectomy over 3 years between November 2017 and October 2020. These were classified into 2 groups based on the administration of an LESI within a year of surgery. Those receiving LESI were further subdivided on the basis of the proximity of the injection to the surgery. The complications encountered during and up to 6 months after the surgery were recorded. Various demographic variables were also noted.

resultsA total of 315 patients were included in the study, of which 129 were in the LESI group and 186 were in the non-LESI group. The overall complication rate was 13.65%, with 17.83% in the LESI group and 10.75% in the non-LESI group (

conclusionsA history of LESI within 3 months of the surgery is a risk factor of intraoperative dural tears. However, other complications, including infections, are not affected by a preoperative LESI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A history of an LESI within 3 months of a proposed minimally invasive discectomy should make the surgeon extra-cautious of the risk of a dural tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

complicationdiscectomydural tearsinfectionLESIlumbarminimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID35772973
PMCPMC9650179
OpenAlexW4283718684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.