Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772822›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Evidence base of economic evaluations of workplace-based interventions reducing occupational sitting time: an integrative review.

Sanaz Akhavan Rad, Frank Kiwanuka, Raija Korpelainen, Paulus Torkki

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06149364 (Cost-effectiveness and Impact of a Workplace-based Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sitting Time Among Office-based Workers), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06149364 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Cost-effectiveness and Impact of a Workplace-based Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sitting Time Among Office-based Workers: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan2024 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsPhysical Inactivity, Sedentary Behavior, Occupational Diseases, Physical ActivityArmsISKE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanaz Akhavan RadDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland sanaz.akhavan-rad@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-5292
Frank KiwanukaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Raija KorpelainenDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute, Oulu, Finland.
Paulus TorkkiDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the evidence on the economic evaluations of workplace-based interventions that are designed to reduce prolonged periods of occupational sitting.

designAn integrative review. DATA SOURCES: The search was conducted in 11 databases, including PubMed, Scopus, PsychINFO, NHS-EED, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ProQuest, Cochrane library, Sportdiscus, Research Paper in Economics (RePeC), the International Health Economic Association (IHEA) and EconLit. The databases were searched for articles published from inception to January 2022. Subsequent citation searches were also conducted in Google Scholar. The items of the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist were used for quality appraisal of the included studies.

resultsThis review included five randomised control trails, including 757 office-based workers in high-income countries. The median quality appraisal score based on the CHEC items was 14 points (a range of 9-18). The mean duration of interventions was 33 weeks (a range of 4-52 weeks). Overall, the studies reported economic benefit when implemented to reduce occupational sitting time but no effect on absenteeism. From the societal perspective, the interventions (eg, the use of a sit-stand desk) were cost-effective.

conclusionThe economic impact of workplace interventions implemented to reduce occupational sitting time is evident; however, the existing evidence is limited, which precludes strong conclusions. Cost-effectiveness is not often evaluated in the studies exploring workplace interventions that address occupational sitting time. Workplace interventions are still in the development and testing phase; thus, the challenge for future studies is to include economic evaluation of interventions addressing sedentary behaviour in workplaces. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021226275.

Indexed as

Sitting PositionWorkplaceCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansSedentary BehaviorTime FactorsOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHSPORTS MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35772822
PMCPMC9247688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.