Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772819›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial.

Cerys Joyce Tassinari, Ruchi Higham, Isabelle Louise Smith, Susanne Arnold, Ruben Mujica-Mota, Andrew Metcalfe, Hamish Simpson, David Murray, Dennis G McGonagle, Hemant Sharma and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cerys Joyce TassinariClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK C.Tassinari@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-0847
Ruchi HighamClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Isabelle Louise SmithClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8326-1075
Susanne ArnoldWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Ruben Mujica-MotaLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andrew MetcalfeWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4515-8202
Hamish SimpsonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David MurrayNuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Dennis G McGonagleChapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
Hemant SharmaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Thomas William HamiltonNuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-3834
David R EllardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-048X
Catherine FernandezClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catherine ReynoldsClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paul HarwoodUniversity of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Julie CroftClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Deborah D StockenClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hemant PanditChapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. With more young people presenting with knee OA and increasing life expectancy, there is an unmet need to postpone time to first KR. Knee joint distraction (KJD), the practice of using external fixators to open up knee joint space, is proposed as potentially effective to preserve the joint following initial studies in the Netherlands, however, has not been researched within an NHS setting. The KARDS trial will investigate whether KJD is non-inferior to KR in terms of patient-reported postoperative pain 12 months post-surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: KARDS is a phase III, multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing KJD with KR in patients with severe knee OA, employing a hybrid-expertise design, with internal pilot phase and process evaluation. 344 participants will be randomised (1:1) to KJD or KR. The primary outcome measure is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain domain score at 12 months post-operation. Secondary outcome measures include patient-reported overall KOOS, Pain Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford Knee Scores, knee function assessments, joint space width, complications and further interventions over 24 months post-operation. Per patient cost difference between KR and KJD and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 24 months will be estimated within trial, and incremental cost per QALY gained over 20 years by KJD relative to KR predicted using decision analytic modelling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Research Authority (HRA). Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14879004; recruitment opened April 2021.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeAdolescentClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansKnee JointMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative PainPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomekneemusculoskeletal disordersorthopaedic & trauma surgerystatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID35772819
PMCPMC9247693
OpenAlexW4283776771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.