SynthesisThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2022
Comparative efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating lung function, asthma control, and safety outcomes.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of biologics for uncontrolled asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical and pathological histology efficacy of biological therapy for severe asthma with a phenotype of type 2 inflammation - systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Advanced Biologic Therapies in the Management of Asthma in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Network Meta-Analysis.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Adverse events of anti-IL-5 drugs in patients with eosinophilic asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence-based assessments.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in asthma: A target trial emulation.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Trial
- Comment on 'A Real-World Controlled Multicentre Study Evaluating the Association Between Benralizumab Therapy and Major Outcomes in Severe Asthma'.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Therapies for Uncontrolled Asthma: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Eosinophilic Depletion with Benralizumab, Mepolizumab, and Depemokimab: A Modeling Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Potential Impact of Biologic Use on Asthma-Related Hospitalization: An Epidemiological Study in Hong Kong.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Biologic Therapies and Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab, Omalizumab, and Mepolizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab and Benralizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Asthma.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Integrative epidemiology and immunotranscriptomics uncover a risk and potential mechanism for cutaneous lymphoma unmasking or progression with dupilumab therapy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring dupilumab for asthma: from mechanistic insights to clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Long-Term Eosinophil Depletion: A Real-World Perspective on the Safety and Durability of Benralizumab Treatment in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe comparative safety and efficacy of the biologics currently approved for asthma are unclear.
objectiveWe compared the safety and efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in individuals with severe eosinophilic asthma.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published 2000 to 2021. We studied Bayesian network meta-analyses of exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV
resultsEight randomized clinical trials (n = 6461) were identified. We found in individuals with eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL the following: in reducing exacerbation rates compared to placebo: dupilumab (risk ratio [RR], 0.32; 95% credible interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.45), mepolizumab (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.45), and benralizumab (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.55); in improving FEV
conclusionThere are minimal differences in the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.