ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2022
Accelerating 3D MTC-BOOST in patients with congenital heart disease using a joint multi-scale variational neural network reconstruction.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations toward environmentally sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Guideline
- Feasibility of magnetization-transfer-contrast relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) imaging at 1.5 T combined with deep learning-based reconstruction for cardiovascular visualization.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Tunable dual-AAV sparse labeling of PVFrontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- Highly efficient free-breathing 3D whole-heart imaging in 3-min: single center study in adults with congenital heart disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular CT and MR Imaging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Free-breathing, Contrast Agent-free Whole-Heart MTC-BOOST Imaging: Single-Center Validation Study in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFree-breathing Magnetization Transfer Contrast Bright blOOd phase SensiTive (MTC-BOOST) is a prototype balanced-Steady-State Free Precession sequence for 3D whole-heart imaging, that employs the endogenous magnetisation transfer contrast mechanism. This achieves reduction of flow and off-resonance artefacts, that often arise with the clinical T2prepared balanced-Steady-State Free Precession sequence, enabling high quality, contrast-agent free imaging of the thoracic cardiovascular anatomy. Fully-sampled MTC-BOOST acquisition requires long scan times (~10-24 min) and therefore acceleration is needed to permit its clinical incorporation. The aim of this study is to enable and clinically validate the 5-fold accelerated MTC-BOOST acquisition with joint Multi-Scale Variational Neural Network (jMS-VNN) reconstruction.
methodsThirty-six patients underwent free-breathing, 3D whole-heart imaging with the MTC-BOOST sequence, which is combined with variable density spiral-like Cartesian sampling and 2D image navigators for translational motion estimation. This sequence acquires two differently weighted bright-blood volumes in an interleaved fashion, which are then joined in a phase sensitive inversion recovery reconstruction to obtain a complementary fully co-registered black-blood volume. Data from eighteen patients were used for training, whereas data from the remaining eighteen patients were used for testing/evaluation. The proposed deep-learning based approach adopts a supervised multi-scale variational neural network for joint reconstruction of the two differently weighted bright-blood volumes acquired with the 5-fold accelerated MTC-BOOST. The two contrast images are stacked as different channels in the network to exploit the shared information. The proposed approach is compared to the fully-sampled MTC-BOOST and 5-fold undersampled MTC-BOOST acquisition with Compressed Sensing (CS) reconstruction in terms of scan/reconstruction time and bright-blood image quality. Comparison against conventional 2-fold undersampled T2-prepared 3D bright-blood whole-heart clinical sequence (T2prep-3DWH) is also included.
resultsAcquisition time was 3.0 ± 1.0 min for the 5-fold accelerated MTC-BOOST versus 9.0 ± 1.1 min for the fully-sampled MTC-BOOST and 11.1 ± 2.6 min for the T2prep-3DWH (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Reconstruction time was significantly lower with the jMS-VNN method compared to CS (10 ± 0.5 min vs 20 ± 2 s, p < 0.001). Image quality was higher for the proposed 5-fold undersampled jMS-VNN versus conventional CS, comparable or higher to the corresponding T2prep-3DWH dataset and similar to the fully-sampled MTC-BOOST.
conclusionThe proposed 5-fold accelerated jMS-VNN MTC-BOOST framework provides efficient 3D whole-heart bright-blood imaging in fast acquisition and reconstruction time with concomitant reduction of flow and off-resonance artefacts, that are frequently encountered with the clinical sequence. Image quality of the cardiac anatomy and thoracic vasculature is comparable or superior to the clinical scan and 5-fold CS reconstruction in faster reconstruction time, promising potential clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.