Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772464›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2022

Systemic considerations for the surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease: a scoping literature review.

Mark A MacLean, Charles J Touchette, Miltiadis Georgiopoulos, Tristan Brunette-Clément, Fahad H Abduljabbar, Christopher P Ames, Chetan Bettegowda, Raphaele Charest-Morin, Nicolas Dea, Michael G Fehlings and 12 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for detection of spinal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. [Surgical management of spinal metastases].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Mark A MacLeanDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Charles J TouchetteDivision of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Miltiadis GeorgiopoulosSpine Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tristan Brunette-ClémentFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Fahad H AbduljabbarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Christopher P AmesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chetan BettegowdaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Raphaele Charest-MorinSpine Surgery Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nicolas DeaSpine Surgery Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael G FehlingsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ziya L GokaslanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
C Rory GoodwinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine Division, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ilya LauferDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Cordula NetzerDepartment of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Laurence D RhinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John H ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel M SciubbaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY, USA.
Byron F StephensDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Daryl R FourneyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Michael H WeberSpine Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: michael.weber@hotmail.com.
AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic assessment is a pillar in the neurological, oncological, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision-making framework for the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic disease. Despite this importance, emerging evidence relating systemic considerations to clinical outcomes following surgery for spinal metastatic disease has not been comprehensively summarised. We aimed to conduct a scoping literature review of this broad topic. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from Jan 1, 2000, to July 31, 2021. 61 articles were included, accounting for a total of 22 335 patients. Preoperative systemic variables negatively associated with postoperative clinical outcomes included demographics (eg, older age [>60 years], Black race, male sex, low or elevated body-mass index, and smoking status), medical comorbidities (eg, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine, vascular, and rheumatological), biochemical abnormalities (eg, hypoalbuminaemia, atypical blood cell counts, and elevated C-reactive protein concentration), low muscle mass, generalised motor weakness (American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and Frankel grade) and poor ambulation, reduced performance status, and systemic disease burden. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to broadly summarise emerging evidence relevant to the systemic assessment component of the widely used NOMS framework for spinal metastatic disease decision making. Medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists can consider these findings when prognosticating spinal metastatic disease-related surgical outcomes on the basis of patients' systemic condition. These factors might inform a shared decision-making approach with patients and their families.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisSpinal Cord NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID35772464
PMCPMC9844540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.