Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772243›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2022

Changes in foot progression angle during gait reduce the knee adduction moment and do not increase hip moments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Kirsten Seagers, Scott D Uhlrich, Julie A Kolesar, Madeleine Berkson, Janelle M Kaneda, Gary S Beaupre, Scott L Delp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsten SeagersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: kseagers@stanford.edu.
Scott D UhlrichDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Julie A KolesarDepartment of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Madeleine BerksonDepartment of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Janelle M KanedaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Gary S BeaupreDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Personalized Gait Training with Feedback to Reduce Knee Pain from OsteoarthritisI01RX001811 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI KOLESAR, JULIE ANN · 2016 to 2021
–
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060RRD VA I01 RX001811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with knee osteoarthritis who adopt a modified foot progression angle (FPA) during gait often benefit from a reduction in the knee adduction moment. It is unknown, however, whether changes in the FPA increase hip moments, a surrogate measure of hip loading, which will increase the mechanical demand on the joint. This study examined how altering the FPA affects hip moments. Individuals with knee osteoarthritis walked on an instrumented treadmill with their baseline gait, 10° toe-in gait, and 10° toe-out gait. A musculoskeletal modeling package was used to compute joint moments from the experimental data. Fifty participants were selected from a larger study who reduced their peak knee adduction moment with a modified FPA. In this group, participants reduced the first peak of the knee adduction moment by 7.6% with 10° toe-in gait and reduced the second peak by 11.0% with 10° toe-out gait. Modifying the FPA reduced the early-stance hip abduction moment, at the time of peak hip contact force, by 4.3% ± 1.3% for 10° toe-in gait (p = 0.005, d = 0.49) and by 4.6% ± 1.1% for 10° toe-out gait (p < 0.001, d = 0.59) without increasing the flexion and internal rotation moments (p > 0.15). Additionally, 74% of individuals reduced their total hip moment at time of peak hip contact force with a modified FPA. In summary, when adopting a FPA modification that reduced the knee adduction moment, participants, on average, did not increase surrogate measures of hip loading.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFootGaitHumansKnee JointGait modificationsJoint loadingMusculoskeletal modelingNon-surgical interventionOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35772243
PMCPMC9466647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.