Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35772168›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

Reduced-dose WBRT as consolidation treatment for patients with primary CNS lymphoma: an LOC network study.

Paul Lesueur, Gandhi Damaj, Khê Hoang-Xuan, Virginie Roland, Anna Schmitt, Olivier Chinot, Michel Fabbro, Philippe Agapé, Cécile Moluçon-Chabrot, Safia Chebrek and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Paul LesueurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-845X
Gandhi DamajHematology Institute, University Hospital, Normandie Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Cote de Nacre, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4689-3882
Khê Hoang-XuanDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université, Institut Hospitalier Universitaire (IHU), Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle (ICM), Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Virginie RolandDepartment, of Hematology, Hopital Saint Jean, Perpignan, France.
Anna SchmittDepartment of Hematology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6303-3294
Olivier ChinotDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-9691
Michel FabbroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-4777
Philippe AgapéDepartment of Hematology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.
Cécile Moluçon-ChabrotDepartment of Hematology, CHU Estaing, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Safia ChebrekDepartment of Hematology, Hopital d'Avignon, Avignon, France.
Agusti AlentornDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université, Institut Hospitalier Universitaire (IHU), Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle (ICM), Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Loic FeuvretDepartment of Radiation Oncology, APHP, Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Daniel DelgadilloDepartment of Psychiatry, APHP, Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Dinu StefanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Sylvain ChoquetCinical Hematology Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Lucia NichelliDepartment of Neuroradiology.
Karima MokhtariDepartment of Neuropathology, and.
Bertrand MathonDepartment of Neurosurgery, APHP, Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Sylvain DureauDepartment of Statistics, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7104-185X
Carole SoussainDivision of Hematology, Institut Curie, Site Saint-Cloud, France; and.
Caroline HouillierDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université, Institut Hospitalier Universitaire (IHU), Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle (ICM), Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal consolidation strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Preventing radio-induced neurotoxicity of consolidation treatment through reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (rdWBRT) at a dose of 23.4 Gy is an interesting alternative to conventional WBRT in patients aged <60 years. From the LOC Network (Network for Oculo-cerebral Lymphomas) database, we retrospectively selected patients with PCNSL aged <60 years who showed complete (CR) or unconfirmed CR after high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy and had received consolidation rdWBRT as the first-line treatment. If available, prospective neuropsychological follow-ups were reported. Twenty-nine patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 met the study selection criteria. Nine (31%) patients experienced relapse during the follow-up, with a median time from radiotherapy to recurrence of 8.7 months (interquartile range, 4-11.5). Five of those patients received salvage treatment and consolidation with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79%-100%), 72% (95% CI, 56%-88%), and 69% (95% CI, 52%-85%) at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Overall survival rates were 100%, 89% (95% CI, 79%-100%), and 86% (95% CI, 74%-99%) at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively, and were consistent with those observed for standard-dose WBRT (sdWBRT). No prognostic factor was identified. The results of the 36-month neuropsychological follow-up for a subset of patients appeared reassuring, with most patients exhibiting maintenance of or improvements in their baseline conditions. Our results, combined with phase 2 study results, support the use of rdWBRT instead of sdWBRT as a consolidation treatment in <60-year-old patients showing CR after induction treatment.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphoma, Non-HodgkinAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID35772168
PMCPMC9631661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.