ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2022
Leveraging Algorithms to Improve Decision-Making Workflows for Genomic Data Access and Management.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for genomic science: a scoping review of concepts, architectures, applications, and open challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Toward ethical provenance tracking: The GA4GH model data access agreement (DAA).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- A qualitative interview study to determine barriers and facilitators of implementing automated decision support tools for genomic data access.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Achieving Procedural Parity in Managing Access to Genomic and Related Health Data: A Global Survey of Data Access Committee Members.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2024Article
- Investigating the Roles and Responsibilities of Institutional Signing Officials After Data Sharing Policy Reform for Federally Funded Research in the United States: National Survey.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Federated Analysis for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: A Technical and Legal Primer.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on the ethics of automating clinical or research decision making using artificial intelligence and other algorithmic tools abound. Less attention has been paid, however, to the scope for, and ethics of, automating decision making within regulatory apparatuses governing the access, use, and exchange of data involving humans for research. In this article, we map how the binary logic flows and real-time capabilities of automated decision support (ADS) systems may be leveraged to accelerate one rate-limiting step in scientific discovery: data access management. We contend that improved auditability, consistency, and efficiency of the data access request
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.