Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771943›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Racial social norms among Brazilian students: Academic performance, popularity, and racial identification.

Alysson Portella, Charles Kirschbaum, Naercio Menezes-Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Racial social norms among Brazilian students: Academic performance, popularity, and racial identification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alysson PortellaDepartment of Economics, Insper Institute of Education and Research, São Paulo, 04546-042, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-6784
Charles KirschbaumDepartment of Economics, Insper Institute of Education and Research, São Paulo, 04546-042, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2618-2597
Naercio Menezes-FilhoDepartment of Economics, Insper Institute of Education and Research, São Paulo, 04546-042, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-6188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in the United States have shown that minority students might face a trade-off between better academic performance and peer acceptance, which has been termed "acting White." This paper investigates racial differences in the relationship between grades and popularity in five Brazilian schools. Popularity is measured using friendship ties among students, assigning a higher value to students more central in the network. The racial composition of friendship ties is generally diverse, although they tend to favor racial peers, especially among Black students. We find a positive correlation between grades and popularity of non-White students that is driven by their friendships with their White classmates. This contrasts with patterns associated with acting White, where a negative correlation between minorities' grades and their popularity among racial peers is not compensated by their status among White students. We also investigate how academic performance is associated with racial identity choice conditional on skin color, finding a weak negative relationship between higher grades and the odds of classification as mixed race.

Indexed as

Social IdentificationSocial NormsStudentsAcademic PerformanceBrazilFriendsHumansPeer GroupRace Factorsacting Whitehomophilyracial identificationracial inequality

Identifiers

PMID35771943
PMCPMC9271153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.