Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771798›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The association between vaginal hygiene practices and spontaneous preterm birth: A case-control study.

Laura E Janssen, Rubin J T Verduin, Christianne J M de Groot, Martijn A Oudijk, Marjon A de Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura E JanssenDepartment of Obstetrics, Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5983-6932
Rubin J T VerduinDepartment of Obstetrics, Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christianne J M de GrootDepartment of Obstetrics, Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkDepartment of Obstetrics, Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjon A de BoerDepartment of Obstetrics, Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide and defining its risk factors is necessary to reduce its prevalence. Recent studies have pointed out that bacterial vaginosis, a disturbance in the vaginal microbiome, is associated with SPTB. It is hypothesized that vaginal hygiene practices can alter the vaginal microbiome and are therefore associated with SPTB, but there are no studies investigating this matter. METHODS AND

findingsA case-control study was conducted between August 2018 and July 2021 in two affiliated university medical centers in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We included a total of 79 women with a SPTB and compared them with 156 women with a term birth. Women with uterine anomalies, a history of cervical surgery or major congenital anomalies of the fetus were excluded. All participants filled in a questionnaire about vaginal washing with water, soap or gel, the use of intravaginal douches and vaginal steaming, both before and during pregnancy. Most women washed vaginally with water, 144 (61.3%) women before pregnancy and 135 (57.4%) women during pregnancy. A total of 43 (18.3%) washed with soap before and 36 (15.3%) during pregnancy. Before pregnancy, 40 (17.0%) women washed with vaginal gel and 27 (11.5%) during pregnancy. We found that the use of vaginal gel before pregnancy (aOR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.08-4.84) and even more during pregnancy, was associated with SPTB (aOR 3.45, 95% CI: 1.37-8.67). No association was found between washing with water or soap, intravaginal douching, or vaginal steaming and SPTB.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the use of vaginal gel is associated with SPTB. Women should be informed that vaginal use of gels might not be safe.

Indexed as

Premature BirthCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansHygieneInfant, NewbornPregnancySoapsVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesWaterSoapsVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesWater

Identifiers

PMID35771798
PMCPMC9246112
OpenAlexW4283728560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.