ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
InterpolatedXY: a two-step strategy to normalize DNA methylation microarray data avoiding sex bias.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis examining fetal sex-specific placental DNA methylation intensities and estimated cell composition post IVF.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Pooled it
- Sex-linked placental DNA methylation associated with early-onset preeclampsia.Research square · 2026Article
- Adverse and adaptive placental DNA methylation changes linking prenatal air pollution exposure to child lung function: findings from the SEPAGES cohort.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- DNA hypomethylation at specific CG-sites within TRAK1 is linked to the neurocognitive profile in Klinefelter syndrome.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Association of Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers With Risk of MASLD-Related HCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Article
- Breaking rules: the complex relationship between DNA methylation and X-chromosome inactivation in the human placenta.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Immediate and durable effects of maternal tobacco consumption on placental DNA methylation: a replication and discovery study.Environmental epigenetics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression in human placentas derived from assisted reproductive technology.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Genetic variation and pesticide exposure influence blood DNA methylation signatures in females with early-stage Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Insights into ageing rates comparison across tissues from recalibrating cerebellum DNA methylation clock.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Article
- Who's afraid of the X? Incorporating the X and Y chromosomes into the analysis of DNA methylation array data.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2023Article
- Characterising sex differences of autosomal DNA methylation in whole blood using the Illumina EPIC array.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationData normalization is an essential step to reduce technical variation within and between arrays. Due to the different karyotypes and the effects of X chromosome inactivation, females and males exhibit distinct methylation patterns on sex chromosomes; thus, it poses a significant challenge to normalize sex chromosome data without introducing bias. Currently, existing methods do not provide unbiased solutions to normalize sex chromosome data, usually, they just process autosomal and sex chromosomes indiscriminately.
resultsHere, we demonstrate that ignoring this sex difference will lead to introducing artificial sex bias, especially for thousands of autosomal CpGs. We present a novel two-step strategy (interpolatedXY) to address this issue, which is applicable to all quantile-based normalization methods. By this new strategy, the autosomal CpGs are first normalized independently by conventional methods, such as funnorm or dasen; then the corrected methylation values of sex chromosome-linked CpGs are estimated as the weighted average of their nearest neighbors on autosomes. The proposed two-step strategy can also be applied to other non-quantile-based normalization methods, as well as other array-based data types. Moreover, we propose a useful concept: the sex explained fraction of variance, to quantitatively measure the normalization effect. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The proposed methods are available by calling the function 'adjustedDasen' or 'adjustedFunnorm' in the latest wateRmelon package (https://github.com/schalkwyk/wateRmelon), with methods compatible with all the major workflows, including minfi. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.