Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771651›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

InterpolatedXY: a two-step strategy to normalize DNA methylation microarray data avoiding sex bias.

Yucheng Wang, Tyler J Gorrie-Stone, Olivia A Grant, Alexandria D Andrayas, Xiaojun Zhai, Klaus D McDonald-Maier, Leonard C Schalkwyk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers With Risk of MASLD-Related HCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yucheng WangSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-0734
Tyler J Gorrie-StoneDiamond Light Source Ltd., Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK.
Olivia A GrantSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Alexandria D AndrayasInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Xiaojun ZhaiSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1030-8311
Klaus D McDonald-MaierSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Leonard C SchalkwykSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
University of Essex · GBDiamond Light Source · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/M008592/1Economic and Social Research Council ES/M010236/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P017487/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V034111/1Medical Research Council MR/R005176/1The UK Household Longitudinal Study is led by the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of EssexUniversity of Essex
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationData normalization is an essential step to reduce technical variation within and between arrays. Due to the different karyotypes and the effects of X chromosome inactivation, females and males exhibit distinct methylation patterns on sex chromosomes; thus, it poses a significant challenge to normalize sex chromosome data without introducing bias. Currently, existing methods do not provide unbiased solutions to normalize sex chromosome data, usually, they just process autosomal and sex chromosomes indiscriminately.

resultsHere, we demonstrate that ignoring this sex difference will lead to introducing artificial sex bias, especially for thousands of autosomal CpGs. We present a novel two-step strategy (interpolatedXY) to address this issue, which is applicable to all quantile-based normalization methods. By this new strategy, the autosomal CpGs are first normalized independently by conventional methods, such as funnorm or dasen; then the corrected methylation values of sex chromosome-linked CpGs are estimated as the weighted average of their nearest neighbors on autosomes. The proposed two-step strategy can also be applied to other non-quantile-based normalization methods, as well as other array-based data types. Moreover, we propose a useful concept: the sex explained fraction of variance, to quantitatively measure the normalization effect. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The proposed methods are available by calling the function 'adjustedDasen' or 'adjustedFunnorm' in the latest wateRmelon package (https://github.com/schalkwyk/wateRmelon), with methods compatible with all the major workflows, including minfi. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationSexismFemaleHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Processing, Post-Translational

Identifiers

PMID35771651
PMCPMC9364386
OpenAlexW4283734405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.