Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771630›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Radiotherapy-Related Dose and Irradiated Volume Effects on Breast Cancer Risk Among Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors.

Sander Roberti, Flora E van Leeuwen, Cécile M Ronckers, Inge M Krul, Florent de Vathaire, Cristina Veres, Ibrahima Diallo, Cécile P M Janus, Berthe M P Aleman, Nicola S Russell and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sander RobertiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6275-7442
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cécile M RonckersInstitute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-4657
Inge M KrulDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Florent de VathaireRadiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8374-9281
Cristina VeresUniversity Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Ibrahima DialloUniversity Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8272-8817
Cécile P M JanusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-8698
Berthe M P AlemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nicola S RussellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michael HauptmannInstitute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-0148
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLInserm · FRMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) risk is increased among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with chest radiotherapy. Case-control studies showed a linear radiation dose-response relationship for estimated dose to the breast tumor location. However, these relative risks cannot be used for absolute risk prediction of BC anywhere in the breasts. Furthermore, the independent and joint effects of radiation dose and irradiated volumes are unclear. Therefore, we examined the effects of mean breast dose and various dose-volume parameters on BC risk in HL patients.

methodsWe conducted a nested case-control study of BC among 5-year HL survivors (173 case patients, 464 matched control patients). Dose-volume histograms were obtained from reconstructed voxel-based 3-dimensional dose distributions. Summary parameters of dose-volume histograms were studied next to mean and median breast dose, Gini index, and the new dose metric mean absolute difference of dose, using categorical and linear excess odds ratio (EOR) models. Interactions between dose-volume parameters and mean dose were also examined.

resultsStatistically significant linear dose-response relationships were observed for mean breast dose (EOR per Gy = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 1.06) and median dose (EOR/Gy = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.19), with no statistically significant curvature. All metrics except Gini and mean absolute difference were positively correlated with each other. These metrics all showed similar patterns of dose-response that were no longer statistically significant when adjusting for mean dose. No statistically significant modification of the effect of mean dose was observed.

conclusionMean breast dose predicts subsequent BC risk in long-term HL survivors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHodgkin DiseaseRadiation InjuriesCase-Control StudiesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansRadiotherapy DosageRiskSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID35771630
PMCPMC9468297
OpenAlexW4283736117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.