Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771625›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Topological analysis as a tool for detection of abnormalities in protein-protein interaction data.

Alicja W Nowakowska, Malgorzata Kotulska

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alicja W NowakowskaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-8212
Malgorzata KotulskaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2015-5339

Funding

National Science Centre 2019/35/B/NZ2/03997Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing at Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein-protein interaction datasets, which can be modeled as networks, constitute an essential layer in multi-omics approach to biomedical knowledge. This representation gives insight into molecular pathways, help to uncover novel potential drug targets or predict a therapy outcome. Nevertheless, the data that constitute such systems are frequently incomplete, error-prone and biased by scientific trends. Implementation of methods for detection of such shortcomings could improve protein-protein interaction data analysis.

resultsWe performed topological analysis of three protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) from IntAct Molecular Database, regarding cancer, Parkinson's disease (two most common subjects in PPINs analysis) and Human Reference Interactome. The data collections were shown to be often biased by scientific interests, which highly impact the networks structure. This may obscure correct systematic biological interpretation of the protein-protein interactions and limit their application potential. As a solution to this problem, we propose a set of topological methods for the bias detection, which performed in the first step provides more objective biological conclusions regarding protein-protein interactions and their multi-omics consequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A user-friendly tool Extensive Tool for Network Analysis (ETNA) is available on https://github.com/AlicjaNowakowska/ETNA. The software includes a graphical Colab notebook: https://githubtocolab.com/AlicjaNowakowska/ETNA/blob/main/ETNAColab.ipynb. CONTACT: alicja.nowakowska@pwr.edu.pl or malgorzata.kotulska@pwr.edu.pl. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsSoftwareHumans

Identifiers

PMID35771625
PMCPMC9746892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.