Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771564›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2022

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm Predicting Emergency Department Use and Unplanned Hospitalization in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Christopher W Noel, Rinku Sutradhar, Lesley Gotlib Conn, David Forner, Wing C Chan, Rui Fu, Julie Hallet, Natalie G Coburn, Antoine Eskander

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An introduction to machine learning and generative artificial intelligence for otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons: a narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher W NoelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rinku SutradharInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lesley Gotlib ConnInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David FornerInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wing C ChanICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rui FuInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julie HalletInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie G CoburnInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antoine EskanderDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASunnybrook Research InstitutePublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patient-reported symptom burden was recently found to be associated with emergency department use and unplanned hospitalization (ED/Hosp) in patients with head and neck cancer. It was hypothesized that symptom scores could be combined with administrative health data to accurately risk stratify patients. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning approach to predict future ED/Hosp in patients with head and neck cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based predictive modeling study of patients in Ontario, Canada, diagnosed with head and neck cancer from January 2007 through March 2018. All outpatient clinical encounters were identified. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores and clinical and demographic factors were abstracted. Training and test cohorts were randomly generated in a 4:1 ratio. Various machine learning algorithms were explored, including (1) logistic regression using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, (2) random forest, (3) gradient boosting machine, (4) k-nearest neighbors, and (5) an artificial neural network. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to January 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was any 14-day ED/Hosp event following symptom assessment. The performance of each model was assessed on the test cohort using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve and calibration plots. Shapley values were used to identify the variables with greatest contribution to the model. Results: The training cohort consisted of 9409 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [10.9] years) undergoing 59 089 symptom assessments (80%). The remaining 2352 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [11] years) and 14 193 symptom assessments were set aside as the test cohort (20%). Several models had high predictive accuracy, particularly the gradient boosting machine (validation AUROC, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.81]). A Youden-based cutoff corresponded to a validation sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.66. Patient-reported symptom scores were consistently identified as being the most predictive features within models. A second model built only with symptom severity data had an AUROC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.74). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, machine learning approaches predicted with a high degree of accuracy ED/Hosp in patients with head and neck cancer. These tools could be used to accurately risk stratify patients and may help direct targeted intervention.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMachine LearningAlgorithmsEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedOntario

Identifiers

PMID35771564
PMCPMC9247860
OpenAlexW4283734438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.