Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771513›Full record

SynthesisJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2022

Do financial incentives increase mental health treatment engagement? A meta-analysis.

Gabriela K Khazanov, Paige E Morris, Alexander Beed, Shari Jager-Hyman, Karoline Myhre, James R McKay, Richard S Feinn, Elaine M Boland, Michael E Thase

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the FOCUS ADHD App in monitoring adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriela K KhazanovMental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center of the Veterans Integrated Service Network 4, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-400X
Paige E MorrisDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University.ORCID 0000-0001-9771-9051
Alexander BeedVA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-8175
Shari Jager-HymanDepartment of Psychiatry, Penn Center for the Prevention of Suicide, University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-2707
Karoline MyhreDepartment of Psychiatry, Penn Center for the Prevention of Suicide, University of Pennsylvania.
James R McKayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania.
Richard S FeinnFrank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University.
Elaine M BolandMental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center of the Veterans Integrated Service Network 4, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-3532-6380
Michael E ThaseMental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center of the Veterans Integrated Service Network 4, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Funding

Adaptive Treatment Models for the Management of Drug Use DisordersK24DA029062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2010 to 2021
$1.6M
CSRD VA IK2 CX001501NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEngagement in mental health treatment is low, which can lead to poor outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy of offering patients financial incentives to increase their mental health treatment engagement, also referred to as contingency management.

methodWe meta-analyzed studies offering financial incentives for mental health treatment engagement, including increasing treatment attendance, medication adherence, and treatment goal completion. Analyses were run within a multilevel framework. All study designs were included, and sensitivity analyses were run including only randomized and high-quality studies.

resultsAbout 80% of interventions incentivized treatment for substance use disorders. Financial incentives significantly increased treatment attendance (Hedges' g = 0.49, [0.33, 0.64], k = 30, I2 = 83.14), medication adherence (Hedges' g = 0.95, [0.47, 1.44], k = 6, I2 = 87.73), and treatment goal completion (Hedges' g = 0.61, [0.22, 0.99], k = 5, I2 = 60.55), including completing homework, signing treatment plans, and reducing problematic behavior.

conclusionsFinancial incentives increase treatment engagement with medium to large effect sizes. We provide strong evidence for their effectiveness in increasing substance use treatment engagement and preliminary evidence for their effectiveness in increasing treatment engagement for other mental health disorders. Future research should prioritize testing the efficacy of incentivizing treatment engagement for mental health disorders aside from substance use. Research must also identify ways to incentivize treatment engagement that improve functioning and long-term outcomes and address ethical and systemic barriers to implementing these interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

MotivationSubstance-Related DisordersBehavior TherapyHumansMedication AdherenceMental HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35771513
PMCPMC10603786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.