Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771379›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2022

A narrative review on current imaging applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in oncology: focus on the three most common cancers.

Simone Vicini, Chandra Bortolotto, Marco Rengo, Daniela Ballerini, Davide Bellini, Iacopo Carbone, Lorenzo Preda, Andrea Laghi, Francesca Coppola, Lorenzo Faggioni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fusion of shallow and deep features fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simone ViciniDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, ICOT Hospital, Via Franco Faggiana, 166804100, Latina, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5193-7464
Chandra BortolottoDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-9309
Marco RengoDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, ICOT Hospital, Via Franco Faggiana, 166804100, Latina, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-5692
Daniela BalleriniDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. daniela.ballerini01@universitadipavia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-3571
Davide BelliniDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, ICOT Hospital, Via Franco Faggiana, 166804100, Latina, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-6959
Iacopo CarboneDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, ICOT Hospital, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-7527
Lorenzo PredaDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2766
Andrea LaghiDiagnostic Imaging Unit Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3091-7819
Francesca CoppolaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo FaggioniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-4489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the healthcare setting to advance disease diagnosis and management and facilitate the creation of new therapeutics is gaining popularity. Given the vast amount of data collected during cancer therapy, there is significant concern in leveraging the algorithms and technologies available with the underlying goal of improving oncologic care. Radiologists will attain better precision and effectiveness with the advent of AI technology, making machine-assisted medical services a valuable and important option for future oncologic medical care. As a result, it is critical to figure out which specific radiology activities are best positioned to gain from AI and radiomics models and methods of oncologic imaging, while also considering the algorithms' capabilities and constraints. Our purpose is to overview the current evidence and future prospects of AI and radiomics algorithms used in oncologic imaging efforts with an emphasis on the three most frequent cancers worldwide, i.e., lung cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer. We discuss how AI and radiomics could be used to detect and characterize cancers and assess therapy response.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansRadiographyArtificial intelligenceCancer imagingDeep learningMachine learningOncologyRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.