Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771298›Full record

ReviewAnimal cognition2022

When should we ascribe sentience to animals? A commentary on "Hermit crabs, shells and sentience" (Elwood 2022).

Mark Briffa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark BriffaSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. mark.briffa@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-0538
University of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a new review article, experiments on hermit crab behaviour are discussed in the context of possible animal sentience. Sentience can be defined as the ability to experience feelings such as pleasure or pain but there are also broader definitions that include elements of awareness. Here I suggest that of the different levels of awareness described as components of sentience, only the higher levels (assessment and executive awareness) seem distinct from the basic non-sentient cognitive tasks of gathering, processing and storing information, which are demonstrated by most animals. Studies that attempt to differentiate between basic cognitive functions and higher levels of awareness are rare for most animal taxa, including hermit crabs. Therefore, while results such as those obtained from studies of hermit crab behaviour are compatible with sentience they cannot yet be distinguished from simpler explanations based on basic cognitive functions, which we should prefer for the time-being. Nevertheless, hermit crabs are promising model systems for investigating awareness in animals.

Indexed as

AnomuraAnimalsAwarenessDecision-makingFeelingsHermit-crabParsimonySentience

Identifiers

PMID35771298
OpenAlexW4283718052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.