Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771263›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models facilitates differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions.

Hao-Lin Yin, Yu Jiang, Zihan Xu, Hui-Hui Jia, Guang-Wu Lin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis of MRI radiomics-based diagnosis for BI-RADS 4 breast lesions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao-Lin YinDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Jing'an District, 221# Yan'anxi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yu JiangDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37# Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zihan XuLung Cancer Center, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37# Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hui-Hui JiaDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Jing'an District, 221# Yan'anxi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Guang-Wu LinDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Jing'an District, 221# Yan'anxi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China. lingw01000@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the value of the combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4 (BI-RADS 4) lesions and to evaluate whether the combined diagnosis of these models could improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists.

methodsA total of 319 female patients with 319 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets in this retrospective study. The three models were established based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2-weighted imaging using the training and validation sets. The artificial intelligence (AI) combination score was calculated according to the results of three models. The diagnostic performances of four radiologists with and without AI assistance were compared with the AI combination score on the testing set. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and weighted kappa value were calculated to assess the performance.

resultsThe AI combination score yielded an excellent performance (AUC = 0.944) on the testing set. With AI assistance, the AUC for the diagnosis of junior radiologist 1 (JR1) increased from 0.833 to 0.885, and that for JR2 increased from 0.823 to 0.876. The AUCs of senior radiologist 1 (SR1) and SR2 slightly increased from 0.901 and 0.950 to 0.925 and 0.975 after AI assistance, respectively.

conclusionCombined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate TNBC from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions can achieve comparable performance to that of SRs and improve the diagnostic performance of JRs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFibroadenomaMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBreast cancerBreast MRIDeep learningNeural networkTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35771263
PMCPMC11798232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.