Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771156›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2022

Nanopolymers for magnetic applications: how to choose the architecture?

Deniz Mostarac, Yan Xiong, Oleg Gang, Sofia Kantorovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deniz MostaracFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria. deniz.mostarac@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-6046
Yan XiongColumbia University, New York, USA.
Oleg GangColumbia University, New York, USA.
Sofia KantorovichFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria. deniz.mostarac@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5700-7009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directional assembly of nanoscale objects results in morphologies that can broadly be classified as supra-molecular nanopolymers. Such morphologies, given a functional choice of the monomers used as building blocks, can be of ubiquitous utility in optical, magnetic, rheological, and medical applications. These applications, however, require a profound understanding of the interplay between monomer shape and bonding on one side, and polymeric properties - on the other. Recently, we fabricated nanopolymers using cuboid DNA nanochambers, as they not only allow fine-tuning of the resulting morphologies but can also carry magnetic nanoparticles. However, it is not known if the cuboid shape and inter-cuboid connectivity restrict the equilibrium confirmations of the resulting nanopolymers, making them less responsive to external stimuli. In this work, using Molecular Dynamics simulations, we perform an extensive comparison between various nanopolymer architectures to explore their polymeric properties, and their response to an applied magnetic field if magnetic nanoparticles are embedded. We explain the impact of monomer shape and bonding on the mechanical and magnetic properties and show that DNA nanochambers can build highly responsive and magnetically controllable nanopolymers.

Identifiers

PMID35771156
PMCPMC9367751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.