Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35771011›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Effects of Milk Replacer-Based

Yaping Wang, Miao An, Zhao Zhang, Wenqian Zhang, Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam Kulyar, Mudassar Iqbal, Yuanyuan He, Feiran Li, Tianwu An, Huade Li and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Comparative Genomics ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaping WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Miao AnCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zhao ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Wenqian ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam KulyarCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Mudassar IqbalCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yuanyuan HeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Feiran LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Tianwu AnSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Huade LiSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaolin LuoSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Shan YangSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jiakui LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6065-6648
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNSichuan Academy Of Social Sciences · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKTibet University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota and its metabolic activities are crucial for maintaining host homoeostasis and health, of which the role of probiotics has indeed been emphasized. The current study delves into the performance of probiotics as a beneficial managemental strategy, which further highlights their impact on growth performance, serologic investigation, gut microbiota, and metabolic profiling in yaks' calves. A field experiment was employed consisting of 2 by 3 factorial controls, including two development stages, namely, 21 and 42 days (about one and a half month), with three different feeding treatments. Results showed a positive impact of probiotic supplements on growth performance by approximately 3.16 kg (

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaProbioticsAnimalsCattleLactobacillusMilkgut developmentLactobacillusmetabolomicsmicrobiomeyak calf

Identifiers

PMID35771011
PMCPMC9431445
OpenAlexW4283737408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.