ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2022
Development and validation of novel prognostic models based on RNA-binding proteins in breast cancer.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Silencing RPL9 promotes malignant proliferation in breast cancer cells.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to construct novel prognostic models based on RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in breast cancer (BRCA) and explore their roles in this disease and their effects on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs).
methodsDatasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Functions and prognostic values of RBPs were systematically investigated using a series of bioinformatics analysis methods. TIICs were assessed using CIBERSORT.
resultsOverall, 138 differentially expressed RBPs were identified, of which 86 were upregulated and 52 were downregulated. Of these, 13 RBPs were identified as prognosis-related and adopted to construct an overall survival (OS) model, while 12 RBPs were used for the relapse-free survival (RFS) model. High-risk patients had poorer OS and RFS rates than low-risk patients. The results indicate that the OS and RFS models are good prognostic models with reliable predictive abilities. In addition, the proportions of CD8, CD4 naïve, and CD4 memory resting T cells, as well as resting dendritic cells, were significantly different between the low-risk and high-risk groups in the OS model.
conclusionsOS and RFS signatures can be used as reliable BRCA prognostic biomarkers. This work will help understand the prognostic roles and functions of RBPs in BRCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.