Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770956›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography sensory potentials.

Jessica M Ross, Manjima Sarkar, Corey J Keller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mapping cortical excitability in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Biomarkers.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M RossVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7487-8946
Manjima SarkarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Corey J KellerVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-3490
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Closing the loop: development of real-time, personalized brain stimulationR01MH126639 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, COREY J · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
CRCNS US-France Research Proposal: Probing the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Central Executive Network for Improving Neuromodulation in DepressionR01MH129018 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, COREY J · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126639NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100-P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over-the-ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100-P200 by 56%, "click" loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100-P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100-P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100-P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal-to-noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS-EEG sensory neuroscience.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansScalpauditory-evoked potentialelectroencephalogramevoked potentialstranscranial magnetic stimulationvertex potential

Identifiers

PMID35770956
PMCPMC9812254
OpenAlexW4283745216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.