Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770724›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2022

A global synthesis of ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalve molluscs.

Alexandra Zieritz, Ronaldo Sousa, David C Aldridge, Karel Douda, Eduardo Esteves, Noé Ferreira-Rodríguez, Jon H Mageroy, Daniele Nizzoli, Martin Osterling, Joaquim Reis and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distribution, scale, and drivers of mass mortality events in Europe's freshwater bivalves.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surviving global change: a review of the impacts of drought and dewatering on freshwater mussels.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Parasitic mussels induce upstream movement in their fish hosts: early evidence of extended phenotype.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Alexandra ZieritzSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Sir Clive Granger Building, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0305-8270
Ronaldo SousaCBMA - Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5961-5515
David C AldridgeDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.
Karel DoudaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, 129, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eduardo EstevesDepartamento de Engenharia Alimentar, Instituto Superior de Engenharia and CCMAR Centre of Marine Sciences, Universidade do Algarve, Estr. da Penha, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
Noé Ferreira-RodríguezDepartamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas - Marcosende, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
Jon H MageroyNorwegian Institute of Nature Research, Oslo, Sognsveien 68, 0855, Oslo, Norway.
Daniele NizzoliDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze, 11/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Martin OsterlingDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences - Biology, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.
Joaquim ReisFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nicoletta RiccardiCNR-IRSA Water Research Institute, Corso Tonolli, 50, 28922, Verbania Pallanza (VB), Italy.
Daniel Daillblattfisch e.U. - Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering, Gabelsbergerstraße 7, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Clemens Gumpingerblattfisch e.U. - Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering, Gabelsbergerstraße 7, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Ana Sofia VazCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZInstitute of Ecosystem Study · ITKarlstad University · SENorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NOUniversidade de Vigo · ESUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Algarve · PTUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Minho · PTUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of ecosystem services, i.e. the contributions that ecosystems make to human well-being, has proven instrumental in galvanising public and political support for safeguarding biodiversity and its benefits to people. Here we synthesise the global evidence on ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalves, a heterogenous group of >1200 species, including some of the most threatened (in Unionida) and invasive (e.g. Dreissena polymorpha) taxa globally. Our systematic literature review resulted in a data set of 904 records from 69 countries relating to 24 classes of provisioning (N = 189), cultural (N = 491) and regulating (N = 224) services following the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). Prominent ecosystem services included (i) the provisioning of food, materials and medicinal products, (ii) knowledge acquisition (e.g. on water quality, past environments and historical societies), ornamental and other cultural contributions, and (iii) the filtration, sequestration, storage and/or transformation of biological and physico-chemical water properties. About 9% of records provided evidence for the disruption rather than provision of ecosystem services. Synergies and trade-offs of ecosystem services were observed. For instance, water filtration by freshwater bivalves can be beneficial for the cultural service 'biomonitoring', while negatively or positively affecting food consumption or human recreation. Our evidence base spanned a total of 91 genera and 191 species, dominated by Unionida (55% of records, 76% of species), Veneroida (21 and 9%, respectively; mainly Corbicula spp.) and Myoida (20 and 4%, respectively; mainly Dreissena spp.). About one third of records, predominantly from Europe and the Americas, related to species that were non-native to the country of study. The majority of records originated from Asia (35%), with available evidence for 23 CICES classes, as well as Europe (29%) and North America (23%), where research was largely focused on 'biomonitoring'. Whilst the earliest record (from 1949) originated from North America, since 2000, annual output of records has increased rapidly in Asia and Europe. Future research should focus on filling gaps in knowledge in lesser-studied regions, including Africa and South America, and should look to provide a quantitative valuation of the socio-economic costs and benefits of ecosystem services shaped by freshwater bivalves.

Indexed as

BivalviaEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityFresh WaterHumansWater QualitybiofiltrationbiomonitoringCorbiculacultural servicesDreissenaecosystem servicesfreshwater musselsprovisioning servicesregulating servicesUnionida

Identifiers

PMID35770724
PMCPMC9545824
OpenAlexW4283744094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.