Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770655›Full record

ArticleVascular specialist international2022

Inadvertent Stenting and Percutaneous Aspiration for Treatment of Adventitial Cystic Disease in the Popliteal Artery: A Case Report.

Hye Young Woo, Saebeom Hur, Hwan Jun Jae, Seung-Kee Min

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular specialist international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hye Young WooDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-5085
Saebeom HurDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-5101
Hwan Jun JaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-3400
Seung-Kee MinDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-2562
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adventitial cystic disease (ACD) is a rare, non-atherosclerotic disease that mainly affects the popliteal artery. Treatment is primarily surgical as endovascular approaches are affected by high recurrence rates. However, some studies have reported successful endovascular treatments of popliteal ACD cases. A 55-year-old female presented with right calf claudication. Computed tomography angiography revealed segmental occlusion of the right distal superficial femoral artery. Subsequently, a drug-eluting stent was successfully deployed. However, an unusual adventitial cystic lesion occluding the lumen that was characteristic of ACD was detected during a postoperative imaging review. It was aspirated using an ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle and drained using a pigtail catheter for 24 hours. Follow-up images after 39 months showed a patent artery with no recurrence of any cystic lesions, highlighting successful ACD treatment via stenting, ultrasound-guided aspiration, and cyst drainage. Stenting and cyst aspiration can be an alternative option for selected patients with ACD.

Indexed as

AdventitiaPopliteal cystPuncture and aspirationStents

Identifiers

PMID35770655
PMCPMC9244723
OpenAlexW4283716140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.