Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770652›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2022

General practitioners' willingness to participate in research networks in Germany.

Larissa Virnau, Annett Braesigk, Tobias Deutsch, Alexander Bauer, Eric Sven Kroeber, Markus Bleckwenn, Thomas Frese, Heidrun Lingner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa VirnauInstitute of Medical Psychology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Annett BraesigkDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tobias DeutschDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander BauerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Eric Sven KroeberInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Markus BleckwennDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-5690
Heidrun LingnerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate general practitioners' (GPs') willingness to participate in long-term medical research and in research networks (RNs). DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional survey among German GPs around Halle-Wittenberg and Leipzig in 2020. SUBJECTS: Random sample of 905 GPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND

resultsResponse rate 37%, 69% female. Overall, 57% were interested in participating in medical research, 34% in an active role in a RN. Interest in RN participation was positively associated with male sex, younger age, previous experiences in medical research, being involved in teaching undergraduates, and having qualification in a further specialty. Main motivators were improving patient care, giving a more realistic picture of GP care, and carrying out research on topics within their own interest areas and a reliable contact person at the leading institution. Most GPs were not afraid of reduced earnings; however, time investment was the main barrier for participation. GPs were willing to dedicate twice as much time to research when remuneration was offered. High rated topics were polypharmacy, chronic diseases, drug safety and adverse drug reactions.

conclusionGPs are interested to participate in practice-based research. The study results providing useful and generalizable insights in barriers and motivators should be considered when building and running GP-RNs.KEY POINTSThere is a difference between general practitioners' (GPs') overall interest in clinical research and their job and socio-demographic related readiness to participate in research networks (RNs).GPs are interested in RNs when it is a resource of and leading to enhanced patient-oriented care.GPs are willing to dedicate twice as much time to research when remunerated.GPs need a reliable counterpart within the leading institution.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairescommunity-based participatory researchfinancial compensationGeneral practiceprimary health careresearch network

Identifiers

PMID35770652
PMCPMC9397419
OpenAlexW4283714982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.