Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770358›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2022

Minimal clinically important difference of mouth opening in oral submucous fibrosis patients: a retrospective study.

Amanjot Kaur, Neeti Rustagi, Aparna Ganesan, Nihadha Pm, Pravin Kumar, Kirti Chaudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanjot KaurOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-0140
Neeti RustagiDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-5411
Aparna GanesanOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-2651
Nihadha PmOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-564X
Pravin KumarOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9318-9188
Kirti ChaudhryOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-7033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of mouth opening (MO) and patient satisfaction in surgically treated oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients. Materials and Methods: The status of MO was collected preoperatively (T0), postoperatively at 3 months (T1), and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively (T2). MCID was determined through the anchor-based approach with the change difference method, mean change method, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) method. Results: In this study, 35 patients enrolled and completed postoperative follow-up (T2) averaging a duration of 18.1 months. At T1, using the change difference method, MO was 14.89 mm and the ROC curve exhibited a 11.5 gain in MO (sensitivity 81.8% and specificity 100%, area under the curve [AUC] of 0.902) and was classified as MCID as reported by patients. At T2, MCID of MO was 9.75 mm using the change difference method and 11.75 mm by the mean change method. The ROC curve revealed that the MCID of MO at T2 was 10.5 mm with 73.9% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity (AUC of 0.873). The kappa value was 0.91, confirming reliability of the data. Conclusion: This study demonstrated MCID values that indicate the clinical relevance of surgical treatment of OSMF if the minimum possible gain in MO is approximately 10 mm.

Indexed as

Minimal clinically important differenceOral submucous fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID35770358
PMCPMC9247444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.