Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770357›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2022

Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.

Naser Sargolzaie, Hosein Hoseini Zarch, Hamidreza Arab, Tahereh Koohestani, Mahdiye Fasihi Ramandi

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measures of Corticalization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naser SargolzaieDental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7183-9191
Hosein Hoseini ZarchDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9018-3207
Hamidreza ArabDental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0910-3201
Tahereh KoohestaniSchool of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4924-0350
Mahdiye Fasihi RamandiDepartment of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-2746
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The stability of crestal bone has been reported as a major factor in the success of dental implants. Implants can be placed in an equicrestal (crestal) or subcrestal position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant depth placement on marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: The study was created in a split-mouth design. Immediately after implant surgery, digital parallel radiographs were prepared and levels of bone were measured where marginal bone loss and bone level changes occurred. These measurements were repeated at 3-month and 6-month follow-up periods. Results: In this interventional study, 49 implants were evaluated in 18 patients. Primary bone height was not significant between the intervention and control groups in both mesial and distal aspects at 3 months and 6 months from the baseline. The mean marginal bone loss on the mesial side was 1.03 mm in the subcrestal group and 0.83 mm in the crestal group. In addition, mean marginal bone loss on the distal side was 0.88 mm and 0.81 mm in the subcrestal and crestal groups, respectively. Marginal bone loss was not significantly different between sexes, the maxilla or mandible, and in the anterior or posterior regions as well as between different lengths and diameters of implants. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, there was no significant difference in terms of marginal bone loss between crestal and subcrestal implants.

Indexed as

CrestalImplantMarginal bone lossSubcrestal

Identifiers

PMID35770357
PMCPMC9247445
OpenAlexW4283739514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.