ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2022
Effectiveness, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Short Eyes.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network meta-analysis of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on artificial intelligence in short eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Twenty Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Eyes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of ocular length in hypotony condition: a measurement study using immersion ultrasound biometry and Dino-LiteScientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of a swept-source optical coherence tomograph device (MT9000) to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer (IOLMaster 500) in a high-altitude environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mathematical Modeling of IOL Power Changes After Pupil Dilation Based on Multifactorial Analysis.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Innovations in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Biometry and keratometry measurements after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus patients: a pilot comparison between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Seven Artificial Intelligence-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Caucasian Eyes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Visual and Refractive Outcomes after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery in Nanophthalmic Eyes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Children-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Review of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Based on Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas-A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in terms of absolute error (AE) and receiver operating characteristic curves in eyes with axial length (AL) shorter than 22.0 mm. Materials and Methods: The data of hyperopic patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in MW-med Eye Centre, Cracow, Poland between October 2015 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. IOL power was calculated using Holladay1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay2, Haigis, and Barrett Universal II formulas. The power of the implanted lens was based on Hoffer Q. Three months after phacoemulsification, refraction was measured and AE was calculated. The percentage of patients with full visual acuity without any correction and the percentage of hyperopic patients was determined for each formula. Receiver operating characteristic curves with cut-off points for AL were drawn for each formula and the area under the curve was evaluated. Results: Fifty-six patients (62 eyes) whose ocular AL ranged between 20.58 mm and 21.97 mm were included in the study. Hoffer Q formula yielded the lowest mean AE (0.09±0.08 D), the highest percentage of patients with full visual acuity without correction (75.8%), and the lowest rate of postoperative hyperopia (8.1%). However, the SRK/T formula had the largest area under the curve (0.667). Conclusion: The Hoffer Q formula gave the lowest level of AE in the study and seems to be recommendable for IOL power calculation for hyperopic eyes. Further studies are needed on the use of receiver operating characteristic curves in assessing the effectiveness of IOL power calculation formulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.