ArticleThoracic cancer2022
Pericancerous lymph node imaging with indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence in radical esophagectomy: Protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04615806 (The Value of Lymph Node Dissection of Indocyanine Green-guided Near-infrared Fluorescent Imaging in Video-assisted Thoracoscope Radical Esophagectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Value of Lymph Node Dissection of Indocyanine Green-guided Near-infrared Fluorescent Imaging in Video-assisted Thoracoscope Radical Esophagectomy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delineating precise surgical resection areas: recent advances in NIR-II fluorescence imaging molecular probes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Pericancerous lymph node imaging with indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence in radical esophagectomy: Protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence and mortality rates of esophageal carcinoma are higher than those of most malignancies in humans. Radical esophagectomy is the preferred treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. However, the extent of lymphadenectomy during radical esophagectomy remains controversial. Indocyanine green (ICG) is the most commonly used imaging agent for the diagnosis of tumors and metastatic lymph nodes in clinical settings. Thus, the main aim of this study was to evaluate pericancerous lymph nodes imaging in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery radical esophagectomy using a near-infrared (NIR) ICG imaging system and to improve the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer.
methodsThis was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial (allocation rate = 1:1). Forty treatment-naive esophageal cancer patients were recruited and divided into two groups: the ICG and control groups. The inclusion criteria were age, absence of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, elective surgery, and signed informed consent. Data of participants at four different time points (preoperation, intraoperation, postoperative 1 week and 3 months) were collected and recorded. The main endpoint of this study was to explore the accuracy and false-negative rate of lymphadenectomy using NIR-ICG fluorescence imaging and to identify the location of esophageal cancer SLN combined with postoperative pathological reports. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide more evidence on the extent of lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer and contribute to the development of treatment guidelines for esophageal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04615806.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.