ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022
Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of mesenchymal stem cells: therapeutic effect and prospect for rheumatoid arthritis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- A 10-year knowledge mapping of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Unmasking Risk Factors for Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction Resulting From Early Stages of the Pandemic: A Case-Control Study of Lost and Lingering Smells.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- Global research Activity on olfactory marker protein (OMP): A bibliometric and visualized analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Mapping the landscape of research on insulin resistance: a visualization analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Effect of Dl-3-n-Butylphthalide on olfaction in rotenone-induced Parkinson's rats.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Global research trends and hotspots on human intestinal fungi and health: a bibliometric visualization study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Research hotspots and trends of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for drug delivery: a bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Exploring the research landscape of COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction: A bibliometric study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Bibliometric and visualization analysis of stem cell therapy for meniscal regeneration from 2012 to 2022.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and visualization analysis of mesenchymal stem cells and rheumatoid arthritis (from 2012 to 2021).Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Olfaction is one of the five basic senses of human beings. As such, olfactory dysfunction seriously affects patients' quality of life and can even endanger them. In recent years, olfactory dysfunction has attracted greater research interest, and numerous studies have been published on olfactory dysfunction. However, there are few studies on olfactory dysfunction through bibliometric analysis. This study aims to describe the current situation and identify the foci and potential new research directions of olfactory dysfunction using a bibliometric approach. Methods: Articles related to olfactory dysfunction published from 2002 to 2021 were located in the Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics (London, UK). Bibliometric analyses were conducted with the CiteSpace (Chaomei Chen, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (Center for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands) software programs. Results: The number of articles published each year showed an upward trend, especially in 2020, where a sharp increase had occurred due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The United States was the country with the most publications and the strongest international cooperation. In terms of institutions, the greatest number of publications from a single institution came from Dresden University of Technology. Thomas Hummel was the author who had contributed the most articles. An analysis of co-citation networks and burst keywords in the field revealed a shift from "gonadotropin-releasing hormone" and "apoptosis" earlier on to "olfactory training," "COVID-19," and "Parkinson's disease" more recently. "Outcome," "COVID-19," "infection," and "pathogenesis" are topics of the research frontier and hotspots. Conclusion: More attention has been paid to olfactory dysfunction as the understanding of it has improved in the past 20 years. This study provides researchers with an objective, systematic, and comprehensive analysis of the literature on olfactory dysfunction. The current frontier areas and hotspots in the field focus on the pathological mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction after infection with COVID-19 and its different prognoses. The pathophysiological mechanism of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and COVID-19 will be a primary future research direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.