Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770126›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

A Novel Approach to Predict Brain Cancerous Tumor Using Transfer Learning.

Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan, Atiyea Sharmeen Omee, Tahia Tazin, Faris A Almalki, Maha Aljohani, Haneen Algethami

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Retracted: A Novel Approach to Predict Brain Cancerous Tumor Using Transfer Learning.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-08-09Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/1CF4935F011D38F2C5C57E3BF87D08
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Monirujjaman KhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-8820
Atiyea Sharmeen OmeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Tahia TazinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Faris A AlmalkiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-055X
Maha AljohaniSoftware Engineering Department, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia.
Haneen AlgethamiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21974, Saudi Arabia.
North South University · BDTaif University · SAUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the most prevalent and deadly malignancy, brain tumors have a dismal survival rate when they are at their most hazardous. Using mostly traditional medical image processing methods, segmenting and classifying brain malignant tumors is a challenging and time-consuming task. Indeed, medical research reveals that categorization performed manually with the help of a person might result in inaccurate prediction and diagnosis. This is mostly due to the fact that malignancies and normal tissues are so dissimilar and comparable. The brain, lung, liver, breast, and prostate are all studied using imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound. This research makes significant use of CT and X-ray imaging to identify brain malignant tumors. The purpose of this article is to examine the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in image-based diagnosis of brain cancers. It expedites and improves the treatment's reliability. As a result of the abundance of research on this issue, the provided model focuses on increasing accuracy via the use of a transfer learning method. This experiment was conducted using Python and Google Colab. Deep features were extracted using VGG19 and MobileNetV2, two pretrained deep CNN models. The classification accuracy is used to evaluate this work's performance. This research achieved a 97 percent accuracy rate by MobileNetV2 and a 91 percent accuracy rate by the VGG19 algorithm. This allows us to find malignancies before they have a negative effect on our bodies, like paralysis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerBrainHumansMachine LearningMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35770126
PMCPMC9236785
OpenAlexW4283216797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.