ArticleArthroplasty today2022
A Morphometric Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Can Reproduce Normal Knee Kinematics. An In Vitro Robotic Evaluation.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Tibial Slope on Knee Mechanics for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Deficient Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel In Vitro Joint Testing System for Reproduction of In Vivo Dynamic Muscle Force.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A new morphometric fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) system has been introduced to address the anatomical patient-specific challenges. It was our hypothesis that accurate restoration of the patient-specific anatomy would restore normal knee kinematics after UKA. Therefore, we aimed in this cadaveric study to analyze the impact of a medial morphometric UKA on (1) the varus-valgus and anterior-posterior stability of the knee, (2) the knee kinematics during standardized activities of the daily living, and (3) the patellar tracking, measured using a dedicated robotic testing protocol. Methods: Eight human knee specimens underwent full-leg computed tomography CT scanning and comprehensive robotic assessments of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. Specimens were tested in the intact state and after implantation of a fixed-bearing medial UKA. Assessments included passive flexion, laxity testing and simulations of level walking, lunge, and stair descent. Results: Medial and lateral joint laxity after UKA closely resembled intact laxity across the full arc of flexion. Anterior-posterior envelope of motion showed a close match between the intact and UKA groups. Net rollback and average laxity were both not statistically different. Simulation of activities of daily living showed a close match in the anterior-posterior motion profile between the medial condyle and lateral condyle. Patellar tilt and medial-lateral shift during knee flexion matched closely between groups. Conclusion: Functional assessment of this UKA system shows nearly identical behavior to the intact knee. Fixed-bearing UKA with morphometric, compartment-specific geometry and precise mechanical instrumentation replicates complex knee balance and kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.