Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The Role of Brain Activity in Characterizing Successful Reading Intervention in Children With Dyslexia.

Anthony J Krafnick, Eileen M Napoliello, D Lynn Flowers, Guinevere F Eden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The behavioral and neurobiological relationships between executive function and reading: A review and preliminary findings.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony J KrafnickCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Eileen M NapolielloCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
D Lynn FlowersCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Guinevere F EdenCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Neurobehavioral Evaluation CoreP50HD105328 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WILLIAM Davis GAILLARD · 2021 to 2026
$9.3M
Supplement for Sikoya Ashburn to "An fMRI Study on the Neural Basis of Combined Math and Reading Disability"R01HD081078 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, GUINEVERE F. · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105328NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of reading intervention in dyslexia have shown changes in performance and in brain function. However, there is little consistency in the location of brain regions associated with successful reading gains in children, most likely due to variability/limitations in methodologies (study design, participant criteria, and neuroimaging procedures). Ultimately for the results to be meaningful, the intervention has to be successful, be assessed against a control, use rigorous statistics, and take biological variables (sex) into consideration. Using a randomized, crossover design, 31 children with dyslexia were assigned to a phonological- and orthographic-based tutoring period as well as a within-subjects control period to examine: (1) intervention-induced changes in behavior (reading performance) and in brain activity (during reading); and (2) behavioral and brain activity pre-intervention data that predicted intervention-induced gains in reading performance. We found gains in reading ability following the intervention, but not following the control period, with no effect of participants' sex. However, there were no changes in brain activity following the intervention (regardless of sex), suggesting that individual brain changes are too variable to be captured at the group level. Reading gains were not predicted by pre-intervention behavioral data, but were predicted by pre-intervention brain activity in bilateral supramarginal/angular gyri. Notably, some of this prediction was only found in females. Our results highlight the limitations of brain imaging in detecting the neural correlates of reading intervention in this age group, while providing further evidence for its utility in assessing eventual success of intervention, especially if sex is taken into consideration.

Indexed as

childrendyslexiafMRIinterventionreading disability

Identifiers

PMID35769700
PMCPMC9234261
OpenAlexW4282598577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.