ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022
Evaluation of the MeltPro Myco Assay for the Identification of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative evaluation of molecular technologies for the identification of prevalent non-tuberculous mycobacteria in pulmonary infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in mainland China and Taiwan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiology, species distribution, and drug resistance (2013-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new commercial kit for Methods: A total of 261 clinical strains, collected at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Fujian Province, China, were preliminarily identified as NTM based on p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) growth test. The genomic DNA of all 261 strains was extracted and subjected to species identification using MeltPro Myco assay and GenoType Mycobacterium CM assay. The results of the latter were used as a control to calculate the positive agreement, negative agreement, agreement and the total agreement of the former. For samples with inconsistent detection results, sequencing was performed for verification. Results: Compared to GenoType Mycobacterium CM assay, the total agreement of MeltPro Myco assay was 96.55% (252/261 strains). Both the positive and negative agreement of MeltPro Myco assay in identifying Conclusion: The reliability of MeltPro Myco assay for identifying mycobacterium species was strongly demonstrated in this study, which greatly supports its usage for the clinical identification of mycobacteria. The present study also showed that the distribution of mycobacteria in Fujian, China, was significantly different from that in other regions and provided important data for future epidemiological study of NTM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.