Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769502›Full record

ArticleBioscience2022

Citizen Science as an Ecosystem of Engagement: Implications for Learning and Broadening Participation.

Bradley C Allf, Caren B Cooper, Lincoln R Larson, Robert R Dunn, Sara E Futch, Maria Sharova, Darlene Cavalier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A survey of the representativeness and usefulness of wastewater-based surveillance systems in 10 countries across Europe in 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley C AllfDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Caren B CooperDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-8892
Lincoln R LarsonNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Sara E FutchNature Conservancy, Durham, North Carolina.
Maria SharovaThriving Earth Exchange, an initiative of the American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
Darlene CavalierArizona State University and the founder of SciStarter, Tempe, Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bulk of research on citizen science participants is project centric, based on an assumption that volunteers experience a single project. Contrary to this assumption, survey responses (

Indexed as

conservationcrowdsourcingeducationpublic sciencevolunteer management

Identifiers

PMID35769502
PMCPMC9236874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.