Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769390›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2022

Expected Cost Savings From Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scan Screening for Lung Cancer in Alberta, Canada.

Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Truong-Minh Pham, Arianna Waye, Alain Tremblay, Huiming Yang, Michelle L Dean, Tracy Wasylak, Randeep Sangha, Douglas Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nguyen Xuan ThanhStrategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Truong-Minh PhamCancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arianna WayeInnovation Evidence Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alain TremblayDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Huiming YangProvincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michelle L DeanGlans-Look Lung Cancer Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tracy WasylakStrategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Randeep SanghaCross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Douglas StewartCancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The expensive modern therapeutic regimens for advanced lung cancer (LC) stages have been recently approved. We evaluated whether low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LC screening of high-risk Albertans is cost saving. Methods: We used a decision analytical modeling technique with a health system perspective and a time horizon of 3 years to compare benefits associated with reduced health service utilization (HSU) from earlier diagnosis to the costs of screening. Using patient-level data, HSU costs by stage of disease were estimated for patients with LC, including inpatient, outpatient, and physician services, and costs for prescription drugs and cancer treatments. Results: Of 101,000 people aged 55 to 74 years eligible for screening, an estimated 88,476 scans would be performed in Alberta in 3 years. Given LDCT sensitivity and specificity of 90.5% and 93.1%, respectively, we estimated that a stage shift toward earlier diagnosis would be expected whereby 43% more patients would be identified at stage 1 or 2 as compared with without screening. The estimated cost of screening is $35.6 million (M), whereas the stage shift associated with screening would avoid $42M in HSU costs. The net cost avoidance associated with screening is therefore $6.65M. The probability for the screening to be cost saving is estimated at 72%. Conclusions: This study has revealed that LDCT LC screening is likely to be cost saving in Alberta. Adoption of this program into the provincial health care system is worth considering provided constraints in the system related to surgical capacity and CT wait times could be addressed.

Indexed as

CanadaCost savingLow dose CTLung cancerScreening

Identifiers

PMID35769390
PMCPMC9234227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.