Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769389›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2022

Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Among Physicians in the United States.

Karthik J Kota, Stephanie Ji, Michelle T Bover-Manderski, Cristine D Delnevo, Michael B Steinberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Patient Navigation on Completion of Lung Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karthik J KotaDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Stephanie JiDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Michelle T Bover-ManderskiRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Cristine D DelnevoRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Michael B SteinbergDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · US

Funding

Physicians' Perceptions, Attitudes, and Communication of E-Cigarettes (PACE)R01CA190444 · NCI · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DELNEVO, CRISTINE D, STEINBERG, MICHAEL B. · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and has historically been detected late in its course. Low-dose computed tomography scan (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% and is currently recommended by clinical practice guidelines. However, compared with other cancer screening modalities, LDCT utilization remains low. This study surveyed office-based primary care physicians across the United States to better understand LDCT utilization. Methods: A total of 1500 family and internal medicine physicians selected from the American Medical Association's physician master file were surveyed between April and July 2019 regarding LDCT practices, eligibility, clinical scenarios, and perceived barriers. Results: The American Association for Public Opinion Research response rate 3 was 59% (652 respondents); 599 completed supplemental questions regarding lung cancer screening. A total of 88% of respondents discussed LDCT in the previous year, and 78% had ordered at least one LDCT. Most (59%) knew the tobacco exposure criteria for LDCT and correctly identified appropriate clinical scenarios (49%-86% responded correctly). Less than half of respondents correctly identified the age eligibility criteria (44%-45% responded correctly). In general, male physicians, those who graduated after 1990, and family medicine physicians were more likely to report accurate knowledge regarding LDCT eligibility. The top perceived barriers to LDCT were cost to the patient (48% identified as a major barrier), insurance not covering screening (46% major), and patients being unaware of lung cancer screening (40% major). Conclusion: Knowledge and practices about lung cancer screening are improving, though remain suboptimal. The most common barriers remain cost or insurance-based and suggest the need for a systems-based response to increase awareness and reduce the underutilization of LDCT.

Indexed as

BarriersLDCTLung cancerPhysicianScreening

Identifiers

PMID35769389
PMCPMC9234709
OpenAlexW4224285886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.